There is a school of thought that national polls don’t matter when it comes to presidential nominations, and that upsets in the early contests of Iowa and New Hampshire can change everything overnight. Nonsense. Iowa and New Hampshire can give an underdog candidate enough of a boost to go on campaigning, but the national media generally write that candidate off as soon as he or she loses a contest. (Case in point: John McCain in 2000, who became George W. Bush’s main opponent by winning New Hampshire, then was tagged as a hopeless cause after losing a single primary, in South Carolina.) National front-runners, by contrast, can lose several early contests and prevail in the long run. (Case in point: Walter Mondale in 1984, who lost New Hampshire, Florida, and several other states to Gary Hart before his rival got tripped up in Illinois.)
On the value of national polls before the Iowa caucuses
- Share using Native toolsShareCopied to clipboard
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)LinkedIn
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Facebook
- Share on X (Opens in new window)X
- Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window)Bluesky
Republish this article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to republish the text of this article both online and in print. We ask that you follow some simple guidelines:
- You must use the HTML code provided below.
- You must republish the whole story, credit us appropriately, and, if you’re republishing CommonWealth Beacon stories online, include a link to our original publication page.
- You can’t sell the work separately or grant downstream publication rights to other republishers.
- Please note that images are not included in this blanket license as in most cases we are not the copyright owner.
On the value of national polls before the Iowa caucuses
by CommonWealth Staff, CommonWealth Beacon
October 2, 2007
