THE 40,000 PROTESTERS who showed up at Boston Common on Saturday had nothing to protest because the free speech rally was focused on free speech and not white supremacy or racism, said Shiva Ayyadurai, a Republican candidate for US Senate and one of the keynote speakers at the rally.
Ayyadurai on Monday said the portrayal of the rally participants as neo-Nazis and white supremacists was completed unfounded, a fiction created by the media and Boston Mayor Marty Walsh and Gov. Charlie Baker.
“It was complete bullshit. The whole thing was a racket for Walsh and Baker to set up for their reelection, as if they care for black people,” Ayyadurai said in a telephone interview. “Both of them need to get liberal votes so they mischaracterized this as a neo-Nazi, white supremacist event.”
A 12-minute video of Ayyadurai’s speech to the group, which consisted of about 50 people gathered on the Parkman Bandstand, shows him speaking with aides and supporters holding signs in the background saying “Black Lives Do Matter” and “No to GMOs. Stop Monsanto.”
During the speech, Ayyadurai outlined a number of what he alleged were racist comments by a number of politicians, including former vice president Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton. But he said racism was not the message of the group on the Parkman Bandstand.
“I don’t see any racists here,” Ayyadurai said in his speech to the group. “They want to come beat us, but we’ll give them love. We are here for love, love, love.”
Ayyardurai said he left the bandstand shortly after his speech, so he did not know what was said after that. (The rally lasted less than an hour.) But he said in the telephone interview that he was confident members of the group, which he said included members of the Green Party and backers of Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein, were not spouting racial slurs.
“This was a completely, completely, completely positive event. It had nothing to do with racism. Nothing to do with white supremacy,” he said. “If there were people spouting that type of stuff, don’t you think they would have ripped apart our posters the way the antifa people were doing to people with Trump hats. Where were the fascists? They were outside. They weren’t in the gazebo.”
Asked about Ayyadurai’s claims, a spokeswoman for Walsh provided a transcript of the mayor’s comments on Sunday when he said “the Boston Police Department worked with the ‘Free Speech’ organizers to set these guidelines so we wouldn’t have a situation like Charlottesville, so we wouldn’t have a loss of life or have riots in our streets.”
Walsh also said “there were a couple of white supremacists participating in the rally, as well as a sprinkling of other people with different beliefs, and some Trump supporters. Boston Police arrested three people who had bulletproof vests on, including one with a gun on him, and we believe they were white supremacists.”
Lt. Detective Michael McCarthy, a spokesman for the Boston Police, said in an email that Nathan Mizrahi, 38, of Norwich, New York, and a second male whom he did not identify were stopped as they tried to enter the bandstand area wearing body armor. McCarthy said the “ballistic vests” belonging to the two men were confiscated and Mizrahi was allowed to enter and participate in the rally. He said police later discovered a firearm hidden inside the ballistic vest, so Mizrahi was arrested for being in possession of the firearm when he came to pick up his vest. McCarthy said the other male who accompanied Mizrahi was not arrested.
McCarthy said the original list of rally speakers included “some very controversial individuals, many of whom spoke in Charlottesville. Most of them pulled out of the program before Saturday out of concern for their own safety.”
Ayyadurai said it was his understanding that the police had set up two fenced perimeters around the bandstand. The internal perimeter was set up for rally participants and attendees. The outer perimeter, he said, was for the press. But he said the press wasn’t allowed in, and as a result was not able to hear what was said during the rally. Ayyadurai said the police refusal to admit reporters was a violation of their First Amendment rights.
Ayyadurai also said cell service was shut off in the area of the bandstand, which made it impossible to live stream the event. Overall, he praised the work of the Boston Police Department, but said the massive police presence at Boston Common, given the nature of the event, was unnecessary and a waste of public resources. “Someone needs to be held accountable for this nonsense,” he said.
McCarthy said the only people who were allowed in the area between the outer fence and the inner fence around the bandstand were law enforcement officials. “That was made very clear to the organizers [of the rally],” he said.
The city’s public safety plan, according to McCarthy, was based on the estimated crowd size, social media chatter regarding violence toward participants, recent violence involving the same speakers in Charlottesville, the death of a protester there, and events in Barcelona. “Not to mention all the media coverage that hyped the situation beyond where it needed to be,” he said. “We don’t ever put a price tag on public safety. The safety of the public and protection of property during such large unpredictable events requires resources to meet that task.”


Kyle Chapman attended. He founded the street fighting arm of Proud Boys who call themselves western chauvinists. One of their goals is to confront political opposition. Just to spell that out: street fighters confronting political opposition. I don’t see see fisticuffs as protected speech or as a constructive contribution to political discourse.
Women are not a race but it’s still a bunch of white men decided how they want society structure and, laughably, taking credit for western civilization.
dawn:
“While rally organisers vowed their demonstration would be peaceful, one scheduled speaker, Kyle Chapman, has claimed allegiance to a group called the “Fraternal Order of Alt-Knights,” described by the anti-hate organisation Southern Poverty Law Centre as a “new Alt-Right group of street fighters.” https://www.dawn.com/news/1352692/thousands-join-anti-racism-march-in-boston
VICE:
As to the inclusion of controversial Kyle Chapman, the California activist known as “Based Stickman” for bashing an antifa protester over the head with a stick, Kirkland said it’s hard to judge people’s specific motives for attending on Saturday, but that since Chapman didn’t participate in the Unite the Right rally Kirkland said there was no reason not to invite him.
Still, though Chapman rejects claims that he’s a white nationalist, some of his rhetoric wouldn’t have seemed out of place at Charlottesville. “I can tell you that there is a war against whites,” he told the Atlantic at an Irish pub north of Boston bar after being escorted by cops away from the rally. “Whites are discriminated against en masse. I personally have been the victim of multiple hate crimes. As a people, we do have our own grievances, we do have our own story to tell.” https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmmzxj/the-free-speech-rally-organizer-says-he-was-unfairly-demonized. (VICE end quote)
Augustus Invictus was on the speakers list for Boston Free Speech and removed after Charlottesville, arguably because of the national outrage over Charlottseville not because Boston Free Speech had an epiphany about giving him a platform.
WBUR:
Speakers like Augustus Invictus, a political activist from Florida, used their speaking time to encourage attendees to arm themselves for another civil war. http://www.wbur.org/news/2017/08/18/boston-common-free-speech-rally-plans
(WBUR end quote)
Ayyadurai is arguing ‘we are not the racists, your leaders are.’ I think his reasons are entirely self-serving. They present a false choice and they enable the racism in free speech rallies being held across the US.
Let’s take another look at the alt-right coming out party in Charlottseville https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIrcB1sAN8I
“Ayyardurai said he left the bandstand shortly after his speech, so he did not know what was said after that.” It’s good he’s so confident in his assertions then. But also, “Ayyadurai also said cell service was shut off in the area of the bandstand, which made it impossible to live stream the event” Uh huh. Because that’s the way cell service works.
The initial plans for the rally for created and marketed by the same team that organized the Charlottesville rally. That is not a topic for debate, it’s well established and can be evidence of such can be found with a quick Google search.
I don’t doubt that their message was non-violent, but that would seem to be more a factor of the fact that they were vastly outnumbered by protesters of the event. We have all seen how ‘brave’ and outspoken these fascists are when they have the comfort of numbers and firearms on their side. But when you take away their guns and they confront the reality of being the minority for once in their lives, they quickly adopt the tactics of cowards.
They then accuse their opposition of perpetrating the sins they are indeed guilty of: calling them fascists, calling them racists, calling them violent. All evidence to the contrary Mr Ayyadurai: no matter how loudly you scream, your ignorance will never be reconciled with observable truths.
I don’t understand what they are so upset over. The city of Boston allowed them to hold their pity party in a highly visible location, they even went so far as to blockade the sea of passionate dissenters from them in an attempt to prevent any confrontations. They got what they asked for, but last call came early and then these self-aggrandizing morons have the audacity to blame the peaceably assembled crowd for their pathetic display of ignorance.
I love the irony of Shiva preaching a message of free speech as non-racist. This coming from the same guy who calls Senator Warren Pocahontas, and has repeatedly suggested he cannot possibly be racist because of his Indian heritage. We let you make a public embarrassment of yourself, as you are Constitutionally allowed to. That doesn’t mean we can’t relentlessly mock the way you talk out both sides of your mouth, or label you for what you do and say, regardless of how you interpret the purpose of your statements. If you don’t acknowledge your own racist bias, you are not protected from other people describing in vivid detail what you fail to understand.