(Photo via Creative Commons/Flickr by ThoseGuys119) field_54b3f951675b3

STUDENT TRANSPORTATION IS one of the biggest expenses in municipal budgets, and it’s growing every year, putting incredible strain on the ability to manage our cities’ finances. One cost that is proving particularly challenging to control is the legally mandated transportation services we provide to our most vulnerable students.

State lawmakers are considering a proposal that could provide tremendous relief to communities struggling with these expenses, while still ensuring that we meet our transportation responsibilities to these students. They should seize this opportunity.

Students who have special needs or are homeless often travel much farther and longer to get to school, and they require special transportation to ensure they receive the education to which they are entitled. For special needs students, it is traveling to schools dedicated to addressing their needs. For homeless students, it is bringing them to the school they attended before their dislocation led them to relocate to another community. Fulfilling this commitment requires an army of dedicated transportation specialists who work hard with these families to make sure every child gets to school safely every day.

Transportation of both homeless and special education students has grown exponentially in scope and cost. Massachusetts has one of the highest rates of students with disabilities in the country at nearly 20 percent of public school students. Meanwhile, the number of students experiencing homelessness in the state has grown 34 percent since the 2022-23 school year.

According to a report released earlier this year by Inspector General Jeffrey Shapiro, there is little competition in Massachusetts school districts for transportation contracts. The IG was mandated by the Legislature to examine how Massachusetts special education transportation services are procured and delivered to determine why costs were increasing.

One of the most stunning findings was that 53 percent of Massachusetts school districts received no bid or only one bid for these transportation contracts. When no-bid or one-bid contracts are the rule, not the exception, it is clear what the problem is.

There is now a chance to change it.

A proposed amendment to the Senate’s economic development bond bill would strengthen safety and choice by updating requirements for signage, seatbelts, special bus lights affixed to vehicles, and school transportation license plates – allowing more vehicles, such as passenger vehicles and vans, to be used as school transportation alternatives. These simple updates will increase competition, bolster the number of drivers, and decrease cost – addressing several factors raised by the inspector general’s report and raised repeatedly over the last two decades without any action. The changes mirror the language of legislation introduced by Rep, Jeff Roy (H. 3772) and Sen. Brendan Crighton (S.3021) to address the issue.

Currently, no transportation options are available to districts other than traditional school buses with mandated permanent signage and special license plates. Allowing companies to expand their fleet flexibility would both save money and safely serve the most at-risk students.

Massachusetts is an outlier in how it provides transportation to special needs and homeless students. Forty-one states provide alternative transportation to these students through a system that is highly regulated – including requiring new, safe passenger vehicles and thoroughly vetted drivers who are subjected to routine drug-testing. But not Massachusetts.

This situation has existed for years with no effort to change it. Every city and town is confronting astronomical cost increases in these services, compounded by the recent spike in fuel prices. Cost cutting, layoffs, and property tax overrides have become necessary to contend with budget shortfalls.

The inspector general’s report cited several factors that drive costs, including a persistent shortage of qualified drivers, lack of vendor competition, cost transparency, and vehicle requirements. It will take a comprehensive effort to address all the challenges, but one important step would be passing this simple legislation to change a system mired in the past and stymied by too little competition and transparency.

Michael Nicholson is the mayor of Gardner. Patrick Keefe is the mayor of Revere.