Map shows the lease areas of the three bidders in the Massachusetts offshore wind procurement. Dong Energy has been renamed Orsted since the map was first created. SOURCE: National Grid, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

DEEPWATER WIND, one of a handful of companies expected to bid on an upcoming offshore wind power contract, revealed on Monday that it has also submitted three bids on a separate, massive clean energy contract.

The bids are a shocker because no one expected an offshore wind company to compete for a contract against hydro-electric, onshore wind, and solar suppliers, who are generally expected to offer much lower prices.

Deepwater Wind said its Revolution Wind project would pair a 144 megawatt wind farm 12 miles off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard with a 40-megawatt-hour battery storage system engineered by Tesla. The company said it also submitted bids in connection with 288 megawatt and 96 megawatt wind farms. At any of the sizes, the project would provide only a small portion of the power being sought by the state’s clean energy solicitation.

Like other bidders on the clean energy contract, Deepwater Wind officials did not disclose how they would price their electricity.

“Revolution Wind is flexible and scalable. That’s a serious advantage of offshore wind – we can build to the exact size utilities need,” said Deepwater Wind CEO Jeffrey Grybowski. “We can build a larger project if other New England states want to participate now or we can start smaller to fit into the region’s near-term energy gaps. And our pricing at any size will be very competitive with the alternatives.” 

The Massachusetts clean energy solicitation seeks 9.45 terawatt hours of electricity a year. Hydro-Quebec filed hydro-electricity proposals with three different transmission companies, National Grid submitted a proposal relying on onshore wind and solar power from New York and Quebec, and Emera Inc. is pushing a project offering wind power from Nova Scotia and New Brunswick backed up by hydroelectricity from Newfoundland and New Brunswick.

State officials said public versions of the proposals will be posted on a state website this week, but the timing was unclear.

Deepwater Wind said in its press release that it will base its construction and operations in New Bedford and final turbine assembly and staging operations at the New Bedford Marine Commerce Terminal. The company said the project would create hundreds of local jobs in the Commonwealth.

The company appears to be making two statements with its bid – that offshore wind can compete in terms of price against hydro-electricity and onshore wind and that an offshore wind project of less than 400 megawatts is economical. In the state’s offshore wind procurement, officials are seeking bids for projects of 400 megawatts but also allows bids for as little as 200 megawatts and as much as 800 megawatts. Deepwater has favored smaller projects.

Deepwater’s press release said a 144 megawatt wind farm could be built in a single construction season. If the company’s bid is approved, the firm said it would begin construction in 2022 and finish in 2023.

Revolution Wind would be located in the company’s federal lease site off the coast of Massachusetts. The wind farm wouild be adjacent to Deepwater Wind’s South Fork Wind Farm, a 90 megawatt project serving Long Island. Fully-built, the lease site has the potential to host 2 gigawatts of offshore wind energy.

Deepwater Wind said it intends to file a separate offshore wind proposal as part of the state’s office wind power solicitation. Responses to that solicitation are due in December 2018.

Bruce Mohl oversees the production of content and edits reports, along with carrying out his own reporting with a particular focus on transportation, energy, and climate issues. He previously worked...

2 replies on “Offshore wind farm bids against hydro, onshore wind firms”

  1. Massachusetts land based wind turbine projects are a major health and financial fiasco .Falmouth, Massachusetts is ground zero for poorly placed wind turbines in the USA

    The courts have shut down the two town owned wind turbines .Major questions remain about the use of ARRA stimulus funds , EPA buy America waivers and the lack of Special Permit 240 -166

    It remains to be seen what affect the wind turbine infra sound will have on Whales –We may be killing the Whales to save the Polar Bears

    US Navy underwater sonar ( infra sound ) has been proven to disorient Whales leading to their deaths

    Since the installations of 5 turbines off the coast of Rhode Island, Whale deaths have increased dramatically

    We first heard in 2008 that installing land based wind turbines you had to break a few eggs to make an omelette. We now have 21 Massachusetts communities with major health problems over two types of noise -Regulatory measured in decibels and Human annoyance aka infra sound

    Now comes the Whales and they say there is no proof ocean wind turbines cause death of Whales –The same story as 2008

Comments are closed.