PHOTOGRAPHS BY MARK MORELLI
A correction was added to this story.
MARS IS THE LIMIT for robotics engineer Kevin Harrington. Harrington, 32, wants to build a machine that would harvest the sun, soil, and atmosphere of the Red Planet to produce food, building supplies, and robots for human colonies in the future. āLetās say we want to go to Mars and we want to survive on Mars with no supply chain. What do we need?ā he asked. āWe need a machine that can take in the raw materials in the environment.ā
Thereās good reason to take Harrington seriously. He is the robotics lab manager at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where heās following in the footsteps of Robert Goddard, inventor of modern rocketry and the so-called father of the space age. Goddard studied and worked at WPI and nearby Clark University.
Changing the world was on the mind of Harrington and his friends when they graduated from WPI in 2009. Foreseeing a wave of automation, they launched a startup to design software and tech for robots in education. They could have decamped for Boston or Silicon Valley. But they determined the smartest, most affordable move was to stay put.
āWe literally considered moving to Thailand for a couple years because itās cheap,ā he says. āWorcester is proximate to everything we need, an hour from Boston and three hours from New York.ā
The startup didnāt work out. But the team stuck around. In 2013, they repurposed their workshop into Technocopia, a hangout for nearly 100 artisans, hobbyists, and others near the city center. Technocopia members operate 3D printers, lathes, grinders, and soldering stations in the nonprofitās makerspace. For 24-7 access to the groupās cavernous workshop, members pay $125 a month.
āWe have all these tools. But the tools arenāt the product. The people are. We are essentially forming an intentional community,ā Harrington says.


The same could be said of Worcester residents in general as a building boom downtown and growing neighborhoods have sparked what many hope is a renaissance in New Englandās second-largest city.
Developers and nonprofit institutions have spent more than $2.6 billion in construction in Worcester in recent years, according to city officials. Another $375 million is in the pipeline. The biggest chunk of that investment is the $565 million CitySquare project now underway on the former site of the Galleria Mall downtown. Including around $90 million in public funding, the projectās 22 acres include new city streets, apartments, offices, and more. Marriott is now completing a new hotel in the project. New Jersey-based Roseland Residential Trust, a subsidiary of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, is on track to open 365 luxury apartments and to lease space to a restaurant, spa, and bank in CitySquare early next year. A park over an underground parking garage has footings for a tower in the future.
New housing is going up all around downtown. Quincy-based MG2 Group is renovating more than 500 apartments in a collection of buildings that the firm has owned for more than 10 years. Rebranded as The Grid District, the groupās properties include new restaurants, a coffee shop, and other street-level amenities. Boston-based Trinity Financial is planning to renovate the historic courthouse on Main Street into apartments. New restaurants and other development are planned for the district around the Hanover Theater, a renovated vaudeville hall thatās became a successful performing arts center.
The growth isnāt confined to downtown. In the Canal District, a former industrial zone along the old route of the Blackstone Canal that inaugurated the cityās 19th Century glory days, a thriving neighborhood of offices, apartments, bars, and restaurants has taken root in redbrick ex-factories.
Worcester has ballyhooed renaissances before only to see them wither and die. (See āUrban ReRenewal,ā CW, Growth & Development Extra 2006.)
City officials demolished much of the eastern side of downtown in the late 1960s to build the 1 million-square-foot Galleria Mall, hoping it would spur a return to the days when folks from throughout Central Massachusetts descended on Main Street to shop at Denholmās and other stores. The Galleriaās heyday lasted for a decade. An effort to reinvent it with discount outlets fizzled. In 2006, the mall closed for good amid suburban competition and the rise of online shopping.
In 2007, when the first redevelopment plan for the mall was stalling and the Great Recession was around the corner, the then-owner of the site, developer Young Park of Berkeley Investments in Boston, was blunt about the skepticism towards urban renewal in the city. āWhat is unique in Worcester is the general pervasive feeling of cynicism and negativity,ā Park told the Telegram & Gazette.
This time feels different, say Worcester leaders and residents.
THINGS ARE HUMMINGĀ
Nearly everywhere one looks in the heart of the Commonwealth, things are on the upswing. Worcesterās population, now at 184,000, is on track to increase to levels not seen since the 1950s, according to University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute and US Census figures. Property values are $18.5 billion, an all-time high that surpasses the last record from 2008, according to city assessor figures. More than half of city residents are middle-class, earning between $35,000 and $150,000 a year, the research bureau says. City Hallās bond ratings are stable at historic highs, too.
Commerce is humming. CSX built a state-of-the-art train yard in the city. The Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences is expanding their campus. MBTA commuter rail service has improved. WPIās Gateway Park has become a startup incubator. JetBlue is flying from Worcester Airport to JFK in New York City starting in May. The University of Massachusetts medical school and hospital have been expanding and attracting biotech firms. Last year, city officials sold off the last parcel in the 11-acre South Worcester Industrial Park, which includes a new Table Talk Pies factory. Locally owned Polar Beverages has seen sales climb.
Worcester failed to fully enjoy the prosperity that was flowing from Boston to its western suburbs before the financial crisis. Thatās no longer the case. āWhat you are seeing is a lot of pent-up demand finally getting realized here in town,ā says Robert Baumann, an economist at the College of the Holy Cross.
In the past 10 years, as Boston has grown prohibitively expensive and the good news has persisted, many Worcesterites have sloughed off the cynicism Park described.
āThe entire city is coming together,ā says Dino Lorusso, an Italian-born, ex-plumbing contractor who owns Crompton Place, a renovated 1860 loom works on Green Street in the Canal District that includes 15 apartments, a bakery restaurant, barber, and other shops.
āI donāt want to be a big city,ā says Lorusso. āI want to be a great city. A great city to me means that its citizens, people that live here and work here, are proud to say, āI live in Worcester, I work in Worcester, I love Worcester.ā Thatās what Iām feeling right now. I really am proud of where the city is going.ā
That optimism has fueled Worcesterās bids to lure the Pawtucket Red Sox, the Red Sox top minor league affiliate, away from Rhode Island and the cityās application for Amazonās HQ2.


The PawSox are considering vacant land in the Canal District for a proposed new $83 million ballpark. The teamās owners, ex-Red Sox president Larry Lucchino and his partners, want to move to a new stadium when the lease at their current 75-year-old park runs out in 2020. Rhode Island lawmakers have been reluctant to put up public money for the project. Worcester leaders have not yet released their package of incentives, but theyāve made public moves to attract the team, like hiring Smith College economist and sports expert Andrew Zimbalist and former Massachusetts transportation secretary Jeffrey Mullan as consultants in the effort.
āThe PawSox thinking of coming here, itās the culmination of the hard work weāve done over the last several years,ā says Mayor Joseph Petty, who like other members of the City Council holds a nonpartisan office in a weak mayor/strong city manager form of government. āIād love to have the Sox here in the city of Worcester. Oh, Iād love it. And thatās a brownfields lot. Imagine taking care of that, too?ā he says of the contaminated site the team is eyeing.
Worcester officials also swung for the fences when they identified 98 acres and offered $500 million in property tax breaks for Amazonās new headquarters.
WHITE PAPERĀ
City boosters arenāt banking on Triple-A baseball or Silicon Valley East to create utopia. The Canal District will grow with or without the PawSox, says Lorusso. When he started renovating Crompton Place 12 years ago, the neighborhood had little foot traffic. Now itās busy with workers by day and a popular destination for diners and drinkers at night. Local businessman Allen Fletcher is preparing to break ground on a public market and 48 apartments next to Crompton. Other landlords are adding apartments nearby. To Lorusso, the momentum is clear.
āI donāt know if theyāve had a blueprint for this or who might have had a blueprint for this,ā he says. āI do believe the blueprint right now is almost perfect.ā
There was no blueprint. But there was a white paperāone that other Gateway Cities such as Springfield, Lawrence, and others might consider perusing.
In the late 1990s, urban planners suggested that āeds and medsā would turn out to be the greatest assets of older citiesālike Gateway Cities in Massachusetts ā grappling with the decline of manufacturing, the high cost of services and other negative trends. Universities and hospitals, coupled with mixed-use developments, mass transit, street life, 18-hour neighborhoods, and other revived urban traditions, could rescue downtrodden cities, the planners argued.
Those visions appealed to Worcester residents who were living with an empty mall that was sucking the vitality out of the city. Citing their nine colleges and universities, two hospitals, and affordable location vis-Ć -vis Boston, locals began calling for the mallās demolition and a new community downtown. Former Worcester mayor Tim Murray championed the idea, publishing a whitepaper in 2003 that called for the city to use eminent domain to take down the mall.
āWe had a dead mall in the heart of our downtown. What did we need to do to get rid of it?ā asksĀ Murray, a former lieutenant governor who is now head of the Worcester Chamber of Commerce. āIt was a financial anchor. It was a psychological anchor. We had to take action.ā
After fits and starts, Worcester-based Hanover Insurance acquired the dead Galleria in 2010 from Berkeley Investments and partnered with Boston-based Leggat McCall to develop CitySquare. UNUM insurance agreed that same year to move into new office space on the property, triggering $55 million in public funding to bring the mall down and other improvements.
Now that the mall is gone and CitySquare is nearly done, the question is whether the vision that Murray and others envisioned will be a success. Despite the good news about Worcester, some indicators suggest their predictions might be too rosy. The eds and meds theory, so easily applied to wealthy cities such as Boston, might not apply so readily to medium-sized Gateway cities, in other words.
āThe idea that Worcester will be a pedestrian-oriented, transit-oriented, urban, walkable downtown is not yet real,ā says Timothy McGourthy, executive director of the Worcester Regional Research Bureau, a non-partisan think tank. āWhat we do have, though, are the elements and the investor interest to get us there.ā
Roseland, for example, expects to charge $1,400 for a studio and $2,600 for three-bedroom apartments, says Ivan Baron, the companyās chief legal officer. Its building will include a doorman, pool, gym, and other amenities. But those numbers are still pricey. The average rent for a one-bedroom in Worcester is around $1,000, according to figures provided by the cityās economic development officials. Trulia and Zillow estimate the median monthly rental price of Worcester apartments at around $1,500.
āIf those numbers are correct, itās destined to fail,ā says Nader Djafari, who owns more than 124 apartments in Worcester, referring to Roselandās rents.
Djafari loves Wootown. A Wayland resident, he started buying, fixing up, and renting apartments in the city in 2008. He worries Roseland is being too ambitious. He charges $1,350 for a three-bedroom in a renovated three-decker. āThey are not going to fill those apartments and, when they get to 50 percent empty, they will cut the budget and cut corners and then the buildings will turn out to be a disaster,ā he says.
Thatās arguably whatās happened to the cityās ornate Union Station. Built in 1911, it closed in the 1970s as rail travel withered. After a $32 million restoration, the beautiful landmark reopened in 2000 as a terminal for MBTA, Amtrak, and bus lines. But despite commercial tenants, including a restaurant and architectural firm, the city has consistently needed to subsidize Union Station ā to the tune of around $450,000 this year. Whatās more, belying visions of Worcester becoming a bedroom community for Boston, only around 1,300 commuters take the MBTA commuter rail to Boston on weekdays, according to a 2013 audit.
Baron admits Roselandās rents would be a new high. āWeāre taking a sizeable risk here. This is an unproven market,ā he says. āItās a big gamble.ā
But he and other developers believe professionals and students are looking for higher-end housing. Rents in other new downtown apartments arenāt too far behind, either. The Grid is due for 95 percent occupancy at prices that are close to Roselandās, says MG2 vice president Joe Donovan, adding that the MBTA commuter rail is an undeniable asset even if hordes of workers werenāt heading east every morning.
āI donāt know that a noticeable number of our residents do a commute,ā says Donovan. āBut itās the idea of access, the idea that if you wanted to go to the city, you are a walk away from a train ride to go to Boston.ā
‘THEY WANT GUCCI STORES’
Landlords in Worcester have groused that the city is pressuring them to invest more in their buildings than property values merit. They have a point. In August, MassDevelopment purchased a two-story pawn shop and cafĆ© at 526 Main Street for $800,000. The public agency says the building needs $2.5 million of renovations. But the building is assessed at $1.1 million. MassDevelopment, the Worcester Business Development Corp., and others spent a total of $40 million to renovate the old Telegram & Gazette building on the Common. Now housing Quinsigamond Community College facilities, itās assessed at $2.75 million. (The previous sentence was corrected to make clear that MassDevelopment did not purchase the building; instead, the agency provided financing for the renovation.)
The previous owner of 526 Main Street, Richard Rizzo, owns another property across from City Hall that is designated for possible eminent domain taking. He bought the building in 2011 for $60,000 but pays taxes on an assessment of $540,000. Today, three tenants on the first floor generate $6,000 a month that he says is his retirement income. The top floor is a dilapidated 1890s-era theater that he canāt lease, he says. City officials want him to improve the property, but he canāt find tenants who would pay more to merit the investment.
āThey want Gucci stores, chi chi stores,ā says Rizzo. āThatās not going to happen, not when they still have on a weekly basis people lying on the streetā¦that the police have to come and pick up because they have been lying there for hours on drugs.ā
MassDevelopmentās role exemplifies how public funds have been crucial to Worcesterās objectives. The city currently has 18 tax increment financing deals, or TIFs, with businessesāincluding UNUM, St. Vincentās Cancer Center, and the AC Hotel by Marriott in CitySquare āĀ that the Worcester Regional Research Bureau and city officials estimated were worth around $44.6 million. Lasting for as long as 20 years, tax increment financing is an incentive that lets municipalities exempt new investments in a property when calculating real estate taxes. CitySquare receives district improvement financing, which uses taxes generated in the area to pay for public improvements there, too. Developers are also working fast to claim historic tax credits that might disappear under proposed reforms in Congress.
Some of the cityās moves also rankle folks such as Steve Teasdale, the executive director of Main South Community Development Corporation, which has built around $35 million of affordable housing in the past 10 years, helping to transform the largely low-income neighborhood as crime rates have dropped and Clark University has expanded.
As the push to redevelop downtown revved up, city officials, for example, steered $2.8 million in federal housing funds to companies rehabbing old downtown properties that would include affordable units, according to figures provided by the city.
āThere was a sort of direct reduction of resources available in neighborhood development in order to move them into downtown,ā says Teasdale, who says in recent years City Manager Ed Augustus has sought to make sure outlying districts arenāt forgotten.
Aspects of CitySquare have also been controversial, including the expected demolition of the neo-Romanesque Notre Dame des Canadians Church on the Common to make way for more apartments. Buildings in CitySquare are not architecturally unique or bold. The church, says Deborah Packard,Ā executive director of the nonprofit Preservation Worcester, added some flair and was a reminder of the communities who once live there.
āThe downtown revitalization is a little bit of a double-edged sword,ā says Packard, who is calling for the city to establish a design-review process. āSome people really feel that tearing down a building is progress.ā
MACHINE POLITICS
City Councilor Konstantina Lukes thought Augustus and other Worcester officials should have worked harder to force the City Square developers to build grander buildings. But they were hell bent on attracting whatever construction they could, says Lukes. Nobody could do much to alter their course, she added, because a political machine led by US Rep. Jim McGovern, a Worcester Democrat, runs the city. Augustus is McGovernās former chief of staff and an ex-state senator. Murray and Petty are in the group, too.
āWe could say, āIs this a team or is it a gang?ā It depends on what your point of view is,ā says Lukes, a Democrat and former mayor who is often a foil to the cityās power structure. āItās clear we have a one-party system in this state and this city.ā
Petty defended the city leadership. āLook what the machine has done,ā he says of the new vitality taking hold in Worcester.
Symbolizing the inner circle-like style of City Hall is the Economic Development Coordinating Council, an informal group that includes Augustus and city economic development officials; Murray; representatives of the nonprofit Worcester Business Development Corporation; and Kevin OāSullivan, a former Democratic state representative who is president of Massachusetts Biomedical Initiatives, a startup incubator. Sometimes others, like Petty, join. The council meets every Friday in Augustusās office, but it is not officially a public body, and its meetings are closed.
āI guess they can do anything they want,ā says Lukes. āThat could have its bad and good consequences.ā
Augustus says the council is not a āstar chamber,ā but argued that keeping it private allows for more open, productive discussions.
āWe literally bird-dog every important economic development project. It could be pursuing additional commuter rail or airport service, etcetera,ā says Augustus. āIn some places, it can be like going to the Balkans where the chamber has one set of priorities and the city has a different set and these legislative folks over here have a different set. We speak with one voice.ā
Importantlyāand here other Gateway Cities might want to prick up their earsāevery developer interviewed for this story echoed those remarks. They all said one reason they came to Worcester was because the city administration and civic groups like the chamber responded quickly to inquiries, expedited hearings, issued permits promptly, and quickly sought out state and federal help when it was needed.
āIt was very easy to do business in Worcester,ā says Charles Monahan, who is president of the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health, which opened a campus in the city in 2000. āThey canāt do enough for you.ā
Building the equivalent new buildings in Boston, if the school could find land, would have added a few years and a couple million dollars in consulting fees during negotiations with the BostonĀ Planning & Development Agency and others, says Monahan. It wasnāt just cost that drew the school to Worcester, however. His students needed hospitals and medical facilities for rotations. Union Station, the Hanover Theater, and the promise of more attractions were selling points, too.
Born and raised in Worcester, the 77-year-old Monahan remembers the days when downtown was bustling. Today, his students in white lab coats are walking the same streets. Heās planning to bring more as he opens new programs in the city, too. Naysayers who didnāt believe in the renaissance need to think again, he says.
āYouāve got to look five years down the road,ā says Monahan. āWhatās Worcester going to look like? You are going to see a big difference.ā
Ā


Come on. A sign on the door that a store accepts EBT does not “highlight the heavy concentration of poverty” in the area. Even leaving aside the equity angle, you’re just leaning on a convenient stereotype rather than citing any actual information. They accept EBT at many farmers markets now. Would a sign on vendor’s table to that effect “highlight the heavy concentration of poverty” among market attendees?
Here’s a fun fact from the Worcester Telegram’s article “4 Central Mass. school districts get grants for students from Puerto Rico:” the Worcester public schools have enrolled 280 displaced students from Puerto Rico and received a $5,000 grant from Governor Charlie Baker to offset the costs those students are imposing on those schools. That $5,000 grant works out to $17.86 per student evacuee. So, here we have a public school system whose budget was approved months and months and months ago enrolling an unexpected 280 additional students costing millions of dollars and the state awarded a paltry $17.75 per student. Gee whiz, doesn’t anyone else see the problem with public school funding in Massachusetts?
But look all the money that gets suck out of the public school system and given to charter school’s some of which might even act more like exclusive domains for persons whom they choose.
Good point, charter schools will drain more than a half billion dollars from public schools this school year. It’s unacceptable and yet it continues.
Exactly and if a group of rich people decide they don’t want their children going into the public system but they want some free taxpayer money that group can start a little “Charter School” and only enroll their elite kids or who they want, because Charter Schools set their own enrollment and voila. They get all the perks of being a mini ‘yale’ (for younger school age children) or private school with less hassle and the taxpayers give them money to do it to boot.
Developers are buying three
deckers so they can evict us and make them all pretty for biotech people
and commuters to Boston, then double and triple the rent. There still aren’t enough buses, so that limits housing options. I couldn’t still afford to live here without
help from family. How can the city claim to be more cultural if artists
like me can’t pay rent? How can it be a Gateway City for immigrants if
my refugee neighbors from downstairs and in the building next door were
all evicted by a company called Sustainable Comfort which is
greenwashing it’s gentrification?