What Mass. can and can’t do about ICE

January 28, 2026

Last year, as the Trump administration ramped up immigration enforcement and deportation efforts across American cities, Massachusetts’s top prosecutor warned that holding federal immigration agents “accountable” for their actions is a difficult task.

“The federal authority and laws that give them such power – they have tremendous power to enforce immigration law – so you almost have to see something so egregious to possibly hold them accountable,” Attorney General Andrea Campbell said on GBH radio.

Massachusetts was grappling at the time with the fallout from a chaotic US Immigration and Customs Enforcement action in Worcester, where local police tried to clear a crowd of people attempting to stop ICE from taking a woman into custody. Months later, communities were on high alert, and the governor was warning that deportation actions rocking Los Angeles and Chicago would come to Boston as a show of “political theater” intended to “intimidate and create fear.”

The country is now fixed on Minnesota, where an operation that has so far involved 3,000 arrests has resulted in the fatal shooting of two US citizens in Minneapolis. These sweeps have drawn sharp rebukes from Massachusetts officials – largely Democrats – calling for deescalation and a rollback of the aggressive immigration efforts.

Even as Gov. Maura Healey took aim at ICE during her State of the Commonwealth speech last week, the bottom line is that Massachusetts officials have more power to deplore federal immigration actions than to stop them.

So what can the Bay State do when immigration enforcement comes knocking? Here’s a primer on where state officials stand and what policies they are and aren’t pushing.